Bcrypt vs Scrypt

In-Depth Technical Comparison & Architecture Guide

Bcrypt and Scrypt are designed to secure passwords by slowing down validation. We compare CPU-bound Blowfish stretching against memory-hard blocks.

Quick Reference Matrix

FeatureBcryptScrypt
Resource FocusCPU-boundMemory and CPU bound
ASIC ResistanceModerateHigh
Max Password Limit72 bytesNo limit

Technology Overview

Bcrypt uses a logarithmic cost factor to scale CPU rounds. Scrypt requires both CPU and large memory blocks to calculate digests, preventing ASIC parallel runs.

Memory Hardness and ASIC Chips

Bcrypt is vulnerable to ASIC custom chips because its memory footprint is tiny (~4KB). Scrypt demands configurable memory blocks, making custom chips expensive.

Bcrypt Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages / Pros

  • Highly mature
  • Simple configuration

Disadvantages / Cons

  • 72-byte truncation
  • CPU-only focus

Scrypt Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages / Pros

  • Memory-hard
  • Protects against custom ASICs

Disadvantages / Cons

  • Complex parameters
  • Higher server RAM cost

Real-World Use Cases

Bcrypt

Standard application logins

Securing password tables on typical server configurations.

Scrypt

Cryptocurrency wallets

Hashing master keys that require memory-hardness.

Developer Recommendation

Use Bcrypt for basic web configurations. Use Scrypt or Argon2 if you expect custom hardware brute-force threats.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Bcrypt limit password length?
Because the Blowfish cipher it relies on is built on a 72-byte key size limit.

Launch Interactive Developer Tools

Put these concepts into practice. Test, format, serialize, or analyze your inputs locally with these secure, browser-only utilities: